Ina Ree­se Tax & Legal Prac­ti­ce – Flens­burg | Harrislee

Federal Labour Court hears case: Should part-time workers be paid less for overtime?

The Fede­ral Labour Court is hea­ring a case on whe­ther part-time workers may be paid less for over­ti­me. The ruling could affect many employ­ment relationships. 
Federal Labour Court hears case: Should part-time workers be paid less for overtime?

Federal Labour Court hears case: Should part-time workers be paid less for overtime?

The Fede­ral Labour Court (BAG) will hear the case on 18 Novem­ber 2026 address a fun­da­men­tal ques­ti­on regar­ding part-time employ­ment law: Are employ­ers per­mit­ted to pay part-time employees dif­fer­ent­ly from full-time staff for so-cal­led ‘over­ti­me’ – that is, hours work­ed in excess of the con­trac­tual­ly agreed part-time working hours, but still below the stan­dard full-time hours? The case refe­rence num­ber is 5 AZR 142/25, the lower court was the Düs­sel­dorf Regio­nal Labour Court (9 SLa 431/24).

What exactly is this about?

Many employ­ment con­tracts and coll­ec­ti­ve agree­ments sti­pu­la­te that over­ti­me pay is only paya­ble once a full-time employee’s full stan­dard working hours, as set out in the coll­ec­ti­ve agree­ment or by the employ­er, have been excee­ded. For a part-time employee who works, say, 20 hours a week, this means: If they work addi­tio­nal hours, they will recei­ve their nor­mal hour­ly wage for the­se hours, but no over­ti­me allo­wan­ce, even if they are alre­a­dy working bey­ond their own con­trac­tu­al working hours. Full-time employees, on the other hand, recei­ve over­ti­me allo­wan­ces as soon as they exceed their indi­vi­du­al con­trac­tu­al working hours.

Whe­ther this prac­ti­ce con­tra­ve­nes the pro­hi­bi­ti­on on une­qual tre­at­ment of part-time workers has been a mat­ter of deba­te for years. Sec­tion 4 of the Part-Time and Fixed-Term Employ­ment Act (TzBfG) express­ly sti­pu­la­tes that part-time employees must not be trea­ted less favour­a­b­ly than com­pa­ra­ble full-time employees, unless the­re are objec­ti­ve reasons for the dif­fe­rence in treatment.

What was the ruling of the Düsseldorf Regional Labour Court?

The Düs­sel­dorf Regio­nal Labour Court han­ded down a ruling at first ins­tance, which is now being review­ed by the Fede­ral Labour Court. No details of the first-ins­tance jud­ge­ment are available from the noti­ce of the hea­ring. The Fede­ral Labour Court will now rule on the mat­ter in principle.

What does this mean for employees and employers?

The decis­i­on could have signi­fi­cant prac­ti­cal impli­ca­ti­ons, both for part-time workers and for com­pa­nies that employ part-time staff:

  • Part-time employees They may be able to cla­im back pay for over­ti­me allo­wan­ces if the Fede­ral Labour Court (BAG) finds that the­re has been une­qual tre­at­ment. Howe­ver, any limi­ta­ti­on peri­ods set out in employ­ment con­tracts and coll­ec­ti­ve agree­ments must be taken into account.
  • Employ­er should review their exis­ting remu­ne­ra­ti­on arran­ge­ments for over­ti­me work­ed by part-time staff. Com­pa­nies bound by coll­ec­ti­ve agree­ments are also affec­ted by the ques­ti­on of whe­ther the rele­vant clau­ses in tho­se agree­ments are permissible.
  • For SMEs Wit­hout an in-house HR depart­ment, it is par­ti­cu­lar­ly important to moni­tor deve­lo­p­ments, as fla­wed remu­ne­ra­ti­on struc­tures can lead to claims for back pay.

When will the decision be made?

The hea­ring is sche­du­led for 18 Novem­ber 2026 at 10.00 am befo­re the 5th Cham­ber of the Fede­ral Labour Court. A jud­ge­ment, or at least a land­mark decis­i­on, is expec­ted fol­lo­wing this hea­ring. We will report on the outcome.

Any employee or employ­er affec­ted by simi­lar remu­ne­ra­ti­on arran­ge­ments should seek legal advice in advan­ce to assess their own situation.

This artic­le was crea­ted with the help of AI and has been edi­to­ri­al­ly reviewed.

You might also be interested in this