Ina Ree­se Tax & Legal Prac­ti­ce – Flens­burg | Harrislee

Tax relief for energy-efficiency refurbishments: How the scheme under Section 35c of the Income Tax Act works

Tax relief for energy-efficiency refurbishments: How the scheme under Section 35c of the Income Tax Act works

Anyo­ne who car­ri­es out ener­gy-effi­ci­en­cy impro­ve­ments on their owner-occu­p­ied home can deduct up to 40,000 euros direct­ly from their inco­me tax lia­bi­li­ty. This is based on Sec­tion 35c of the Inco­me Tax Act (EStG). Howe­ver, not ever­yo­ne recei­ves the full amount, and for­mal errors can result in the tax bene­fit being lost entirely.

Who benefits and what is funded

The tax reli­ef appli­es to resi­den­ti­al pro­per­ties that are at least ten years old and are occu­p­ied by the owner them­sel­ves during the rele­vant calen­dar year. Pro­per­ties used sole­ly for let­ting are express­ly excluded. The pro­per­ty may be situa­ted in Ger­ma­ny, ano­ther EU Mem­ber Sta­te or within the Euro­pean Eco­no­mic Area.

Eli­gi­ble mea­su­res include, among­st others, the insu­la­ti­on of exter­nal walls, roofs and flo­or slabs; the repla­ce­ment of win­dows and exter­nal doors; the instal­la­ti­on of heat pumps, pel­let sys­tems or solar ther­mal sys­tems; and the fit­ting of digi­tal con­trol sys­tems for ener­gy con­sump­ti­on. Hydrau­lic balan­cing of the hea­ting sys­tem is also included. Important: The work must be car­ri­ed out by an appro­ved spe­cia­list con­trac­tor. Work car­ri­ed out by the homeow­ner is not reco­g­nis­ed for tax purposes.

How much is the tax benefit, exactly?

Twen­ty per cent of the eli­gi­ble cos­ts are deduc­ted direct­ly from the tax lia­bi­li­ty, up to a maxi­mum of 40,000 euros per pro­per­ty. The upper limit for eli­gi­ble cos­ts is 200,000 euros. The grant is spread over three years: seven per cent in each of the first and second years, and six per cent in the third year. Any unu­sed amounts lapse.

If you also enga­ge an ener­gy advi­ser, 50 per cent of their fees can be ful­ly deduc­ted in the first year.

Formalities: What you absolutely must bear in mind

In a jud­ge­ment dated 13 August 2024 (Ref. IX R 31/23), the Fede­ral Fis­cal Court cla­ri­fied that, for tax pur­po­ses, a res­truc­tu­ring mea­su­re is only dee­med to have been com­ple­ted once all invoices have been paid in full. Cash pay­ments are gene­ral­ly not eli­gi­ble for fun­ding. Bank trans­fers are mandatory.

The invoice its­elf must sta­te the ser­vices pro­vi­ded, the pro­por­ti­on of the work car­ri­ed out and the address of the pro­per­ty in Ger­man. In addi­ti­on, a tax return, inclu­ding the annex for ener­gy effi­ci­en­cy mea­su­res, must be sub­mit­ted in each of the three fun­ding years. Sin­ce 1 Janu­ary 2025, spe­cia­list con­trac­tors have only been per­mit­ted to use the updated model form issued by the Fede­ral Minis­try of Finan­ce as a certificate.

A special feature of co-ownership: the share entered in the land register is what counts

In a recent jud­ge­ment, the Müns­ter Finan­ce Court has ruled that, in the case of co-owners, it is not the amounts actual­ly paid that are decisi­ve, but rather the share of owner­ship as recor­ded in the land regis­ter (Müns­ter Finan­ce Court, jud­ge­ment of 23 June 2026, Ref. 6 K 1431/23 E). In the case in ques­ti­on, an owner hol­ding a one-quar­ter share in a two-fami­ly house had paid for a com­bi­ned heat and power plant enti­re­ly on their own. Nevert­hel­ess, the tax office only reco­g­nis­ed 25 per cent of the cos­ts for tax pur­po­ses. The court upheld this reduction.

Anyo­ne who pays more than their share is entit­led to cla­im com­pen­sa­ti­on from the other co-owners under civil law; howe­ver, for tax pur­po­ses, the reduc­tion is limi­t­ed to their own share as recor­ded in the land regis­ter. The jud­ge­ment is not yet final; an appeal to the Fede­ral Fis­cal Court has been granted.

Cannot be combined with other funding schemes

Tax incen­ti­ves under Sec­tion 35c of the Inco­me Tax Act (EStG) and fede­ral sche­mes such as KfW grants or BAFA fun­ding can­not be com­bi­ned for the same pro­ject. Anyo­ne who has alre­a­dy recei­ved govern­ment grants must make a choice. In indi­vi­du­al cases, it may be advi­sa­ble to work out the figu­res for the dif­fe­rent opti­ons befo­re the pro­ject begins.

If you have spe­ci­fic ques­ti­ons regar­ding tax plan­ning for a res­truc­tu­ring, it is advi­sa­ble to con­sult a tax advi­ser, as errors in the pro­cess could jeo­par­di­se the enti­re tax benefit.

This post and the accom­pany­ing image were crea­ted with the help of AI and have been edi­to­ri­al­ly reviewed.

You might also be interested in this