Ina Ree­se Tax & Legal Prac­ti­ce – Flens­burg | Harrislee

Working from home and mobile working: What employers and employees need to know

Working from home and mobi­le working dif­fer signi­fi­cant­ly from a legal per­spec­ti­ve. What employ­ers need to bear in mind regar­ding health and safe­ty, cos­ts and dismissal. 
Working from home and mobile working: What employers and employees need to know

Working from home and mobile working: What employers and employees need to know

Working from home and mobi­le working have long been part of ever­y­day working life. Nevert­hel­ess, the two terms are often con­fu­sed, even though they ent­ail very dif­fe­rent legal requi­re­ments. Any employ­er or employee who fails to estab­lish clear rules in this regard risks con­flicts and legal problems.

What is the difference?

Working from home refers to working at a fixed, per­ma­nent­ly set-up work­sta­tion out­side the work­place, typi­cal­ly in one’s own home. Mobi­le working, on the other hand, refers to working in dif­fe­rent loca­ti­ons, such as on a train, in a hotel or in a café. The employee sim­ply needs to be cont­ac­ta­ble, but is not tied to a spe­ci­fic location.

Health and safety at work: The differences are significant

When working from home, the same health and safe­ty stan­dards gene­ral­ly app­ly as in the office. If the employ­er sets up the home workspace, the Work­place Regu­la­ti­ons even app­ly. This means that the employ­er is respon­si­ble for ensu­ring the workspace is pro­per­ly equip­ped – from the office chair to the desk – and bears the cos­ts of this.

The regu­la­ti­ons are less strict when it comes to mobi­le working. The Work­places (Safe­ty and Health) Regu­la­ti­ons do not app­ly in this con­text, as no employ­er can assess the safe­ty of a hotel arm­chair. Nevert­hel­ess, obli­ga­ti­ons such as the risk assess­ment requi­red under the Occu­pa­tio­nal Health and Safe­ty Act or safe­ty brie­fings still app­ly, albeit in a limi­t­ed form.

No return to the office without a valid reason

The­re is no legal entit­le­ment to work from home. Employ­ers may grant or refu­se this arran­ge­ment. Con­ver­se­ly, they are not per­mit­ted to impo­se it uni­la­te­ral­ly. Howe­ver, anyo­ne wis­hing to revo­ke exis­ting work-from-home arran­ge­ments faces grea­ter obs­ta­cles than many realise.

In its ruling of 11 Febru­ary 2026 (Case No. 3 Ca 6587/25), the Düs­sel­dorf Labour Court held that, whilst a long-stan­ding prac­ti­ce of working from home does not estab­lish a fixed entit­le­ment, an ins­truc­tion to return to the work­place is only valid if it is in accordance with reasonable dis­cre­ti­on. In this spe­ci­fic case, the employ­er was unable to demons­tra­te plau­si­bly why the employee’s phy­si­cal pre­sence would resol­ve the alle­ged com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on pro­blems, par­ti­cu­lar­ly as the employee’s cont­acts con­tin­ued to work remo­te­ly. The ins­truc­tion was inva­lid. It should be noted that this is a first-ins­tance ruling. Other courts some­ti­mes app­ly less strin­gent cri­te­ria when asses­sing the requi­re­ments for such ins­truc­tions to return to the workplace.

Working hours, rest periods and data protection

The same rules app­ly to the recor­ding of working hours when working from home or on the move as they do in the office. Employ­ers must record the start and end times and the dura­ti­on of the dai­ly working hours, inclu­ding breaks.

Remo­te working poses a par­ti­cu­lar risk: it is more dif­fi­cult to com­ply with the sta­tu­to­ry 11-hour rest peri­od. Anyo­ne who quick­ly checks their emails on the train in the evening is, strict­ly spea­king, inter­rupt­ing their rest peri­od. The risk of unin­ten­tio­nal brea­ches of working time regu­la­ti­ons is the­r­e­fo­re signi­fi­cant­ly hig­her when working remotely.

The same data pro­tec­tion obli­ga­ti­ons app­ly ever­y­whe­re. Howe­ver, in cafés or on the train, the risk of unaut­ho­ri­sed dis­clo­sure of con­fi­den­ti­al data is signi­fi­cant­ly grea­ter than at your desk at home.

Costs and practical information

Working from home is gene­ral­ly more expen­si­ve than mobi­le working. Employ­ers may be requi­red to pro­vi­de work equip­ment and fur­nis­hings. If the­se are not pro­vi­ded, the employee is entit­led to reim­bur­se­ment of expen­ses. An excep­ti­on appli­es if the employ­er pro­vi­des an office work­sta­tion on the pre­mi­ses and the employee choo­ses to work from home at their own request.

  • Clear writ­ten agree­ments help to avo­id dis­pu­tes later on.
  • Poli­ci­es on working from home should cover health and safe­ty, reim­bur­se­ment of expen­ses and availability.
  • When working remo­te­ly, it is advi­sa­ble to have gui­de­lines in place regar­ding data pro­tec­tion and the recor­ding of working hours.

Any employ­er or employee who has spe­ci­fic ques­ti­ons about the struc­tu­re of such sche­mes should seek legal advice, as the details depend hea­vi­ly on the par­ti­cu­lar employ­ment rela­ti­onship and any exis­ting agreements.

This artic­le was crea­ted with the help of AI and has been edi­to­ri­al­ly reviewed.

You might also be interested in this