Ina Ree­se Tax & Legal Prac­ti­ce – Flens­burg | Harrislee

VAT on medical transport: What taxi and hire car operators need to know

VAT on medical transport: What taxi and hire car operators need to know

In a cir­cu­lar dated 14 April 2026, the Minis­try of Finan­ce of Meck­len­burg-Wes­tern Pome­ra­nia cla­ri­fied the con­di­ti­ons under which medi­cal trans­port ser­vices pro­vi­ded by taxi and hire car ope­ra­tors are exempt from VAT or, at the very least, sub­ject to the redu­ced rate of VAT. For busi­nesses in this sec­tor, this issue is of gre­at prac­ti­cal rele­van­ce, as the distinc­tion is not always clear-cut.

Tax exemption applies only to medically necessary specialist equipment

As a gene­ral rule, the trans­port of sick or inju­red per­sons in spe­ci­al­ly equip­ped vehic­les may be ful­ly exempt from VAT under Sec­tion 4(17)(b) of the Value Added Tax Act (UStG). The cru­cial fac­tor here is whe­ther the spe­cial vehic­le equip­ment is medi­cal­ly neces­sa­ry. If a pati­ent can be trans­por­ted wit­hout any pro­blems using an ordi­na­ry taxi or hire car, the tax exemp­ti­on does not app­ly, even if a spe­cia­li­sed vehic­le is used.

As pro­of, the tax aut­ho­ri­ties requi­re a medi­cal cer­ti­fi­ca­te sta­ting that tra­vel by con­ven­tio­nal vehic­le is not pos­si­ble. Wit­hout this docu­ment, busi­ness owners risk having their tax exemp­ti­on refu­sed by the tax office.

Reduced tax rate for taxi journeys of up to 50 kilometres

Whe­re the tax exemp­ti­on does not app­ly, the redu­ced VAT rate of 7 per cent may be appli­ed to taxi jour­neys of up to 50 kilo­me­t­res in length (Sec­tion 12(2)(10)(b) of the Ger­man Value Added Tax Act (UStG)). Whe­ther a return jour­ney is to be regard­ed as a sin­gle trans­port ser­vice or as two sepa­ra­te trans­port ser­vices depends on the cir­cum­s­tances of the indi­vi­du­al case.

In a jud­ge­ment dated 31 May 2007 (case num­ber V R 18/05), the Fede­ral Fis­cal Court ruled that a taxi passenger’s out­ward and return jour­neys are, in prin­ci­ple, regard­ed as two sepa­ra­te ser­vices. This appli­es regard­less of whe­ther the taxi waits for the pas­sen­ger or is boo­ked again for the return journey.

The situa­ti­on is dif­fe­rent for pati­ent trans­port to hos­pi­tal: if the dri­ver waits the­re for the pati­ent as agreed, the Fede­ral Fis­cal Court (BFH) has, in a ruling of 24 Octo­ber 1990 (case num­ber V B 60/89), reco­g­nis­ed this as a sin­gle trans­port ser­vice. The Meck­len­burg-Wes­tern Pome­ra­nia Finan­ce Court has also con­firm­ed this line of reaso­ning for dia­ly­sis jour­neys (jud­ge­ment of 25 Sep­tem­ber 2001, case num­ber 2 K 137/99).

Car hire companies: Special rule for medical transport

In prin­ci­ple, hire cars are not cover­ed by the afo­re­men­tio­ned regu­la­ti­on. Howe­ver, the­re is an excep­ti­on spe­ci­fi­cal­ly for medi­cal trans­port: if the car hire com­pa­ny has ente­red into a spe­cial agree­ment with a health insu­rance fund, the terms of which are simi­lar to tho­se of a cor­re­spon­ding agree­ment for taxi ope­ra­tors in the same geo­gra­phi­cal area, the redu­ced tax rate may also apply.

To faci­li­ta­te pro­of of this simi­la­ri­ty, the tax aut­ho­ri­ties pre­su­me it to be the case in situa­tions whe­re prac­ti­cal evi­dence can­not be pro­vi­ded. If, howe­ver, the­re is only an agree­ment spe­ci­fi­cal­ly for car hire ope­ra­tors, the ope­ra­tor must them­sel­ves pro­ve that a com­pa­ra­ble agree­ment also exists for taxi ope­ra­tors in the same area. In the absence of such pro­of, the full stan­dard tax rate applies.

What does this mean for business owners in practice?

Taxi and hire car ope­ra­tors who regu­lar­ly pro­vi­de trans­port for pati­ents should keep their con­trac­tu­al docu­ments with health insu­rance funds, as well as their pati­ents’ medi­cal cer­ti­fi­ca­tes, in a safe place. The VAT tre­at­ment of indi­vi­du­al jour­neys may vary depen­ding on the terms of the agree­ment and the patient’s medi­cal con­di­ti­on. If in doubt, it is advi­sa­ble to con­sult a tax advi­ser to avo­id unp­lea­sant addi­tio­nal tax claims in the event of a tax audit.

Source: Minis­try of Finan­ce of Meck­len­burg-Wes­tern Pome­ra­nia, Cir­cu­lar of 14 April 2026, refe­rence num­ber S 7244–00000-2026/001

Source: Hau­fe: Tax

This artic­le was crea­ted with the help of AI and has been edi­to­ri­al­ly reviewed.

You might also be interested in this