Ina Ree­se Tax & Legal Prac­ti­ce – Flens­burg | Harrislee

Business succession in Flensburg

Business succession in Flensburg

Busi­ness suc­ces­si­on in Flens­burg: Plan­ning inhe­ri­tance and tax mat­ters correctly

In many fami­ly busi­nesses bet­ween Flens­burg and Husum, a gene­ra­tio­nal han­do­ver is due to take place in the coming years. The ques­ti­on of who will take over the busi­ness is often ans­we­red quick­ly. Put­ting this into prac­ti­ce, howe­ver, is more dif­fi­cult: claims to a com­pul­so­ry share of the estate, a divi­ded com­mu­ni­ty of heirs or an unan­ti­ci­pa­ted tax bur­den can place a con­sidera­ble strain even on a finan­ci­al­ly sound business.

Busi­ness suc­ces­si­on tou­ch­es on three are­as of law simul­ta­neous­ly: inhe­ri­tance law, com­pa­ny law and tax law. An arran­ge­ment that is sound in one of the­se are­as may pro­ve cos­t­ly in ano­ther. We high­light whe­re this typi­cal­ly occurs and what can be sor­ted out in good time.

In the absence of specific provisions, the law applies

If an entre­pre­neur does not lea­ve a will, the rules of intesta­te suc­ces­si­on app­ly. The spou­se and child­ren then inhe­rit joint­ly as a com­mu­ni­ty of heirs. The sole pro­prie­tor­ship or the shares in the limi­t­ed lia­bi­li­ty com­pa­ny (GmbH) sub­se­quent­ly belong joint­ly to all the co-heirs.

This has signi­fi­cant impli­ca­ti­ons for the run­ning of the busi­ness. The com­mu­ni­ty of heirs admi­nis­ters the estate joint­ly (Sec­tion 2038 of the Ger­man Civil Code (BGB)). A majo­ri­ty decis­i­on is suf­fi­ci­ent for day-to-day manage­ment, whilst far-rea­ching mea­su­res requi­re the con­sent of all co-heirs. The heirs may only exer­cise rights ari­sing from a share in a limi­t­ed lia­bi­li­ty com­pa­ny (GmbH) joint­ly vis-à-vis the com­pa­ny (Sec­tion 18 of the Ger­man Limi­t­ed Lia­bi­li­ty Com­pa­nies Act (GmbHG)). Decis­i­ons on invest­ments, loans or staf­fing the­r­e­fo­re depend on the heirs rea­ching a con­sen­sus. Fur­ther­mo­re, any co-heir may, in prin­ci­ple, demand the dis­tri­bu­ti­on of the estate at any time (Sec­tion 2042 of the Ger­man Civil Code (BGB)). If an heir wis­hes to be paid out and the funds are lack­ing, the only opti­on in the worst-case sce­na­rio is to sell the assets.

A typi­cal sce­na­rio: the daugh­ter has been working in the busi­ness for years, the son lives in Munich and has no inte­rest in the com­pa­ny, and the widow needs an inco­me to sup­port hers­elf. Three under­stan­da­ble inte­rests that are almost impos­si­ble to recon­ci­le wit­hout pri­or arrangements.

A will and articles of association must be consistent with one another

In the case of part­ner­ships, it is not the will alo­ne that deter­mi­nes who suc­ceeds. The part­ner­ship agree­ment takes pre­ce­dence. A will can­not enforce any­thing that is not pro­vi­ded for in the part­ner­ship agreement.

Sin­ce the Act on the Moder­ni­sa­ti­on of Part­ner­ship Law (MoPeG) came into force on 1 Janu­ary 2024, the fol­lo­wing appli­es: If a part­ner in a GbR or OHG dies, they cea­se to be a part­ner in the part­ner­ship, and the remai­ning part­ners con­ti­nue the part­ner­ship (Sec­tion 723 of the Civil Code (BGB), Sec­tion 130 of the Com­mer­cial Code (HGB)). The heirs are mere­ly entit­led to a sett­le­ment pay­ment. In the case of a limi­t­ed part­ner, the situa­ti­on is the rever­se: the KG con­ti­nues with his or her heirs (Sec­tion 177 of the Ger­man Com­mer­cial Code (HGB)). Both pro­vi­si­ons app­ly only in so far as the part­ner­ship agree­ment does not pro­vi­de otherwise.

An overview of the most common clauses

  • Con­ti­nua­tion clau­se: The com­pa­ny will con­ti­nue to ope­ra­te wit­hout the heirs, who will recei­ve a settlement.
  • Simp­le suc­ces­si­on clau­se: All heirs assu­me the sta­tus of partners.
  • Qua­li­fied suc­ces­si­on clau­se: Only cer­tain heirs beco­me share­hol­ders, such as a child who is alre­a­dy working in the business.
  • Ent­ry clau­se: A par­ti­cu­lar per­son is gran­ted the right to join the com­pa­ny, but is not obli­ged to do so.

Where things go wrong in practice

Often, the will and the part­ner­ship agree­ment were drawn up at dif­fe­rent times and by dif­fe­rent advi­sers. The will desi­gna­tes the son as the suc­ces­sor, but the part­ner­ship agree­ment con­ta­ins a con­ti­nua­tion clau­se. In such cases, the share in the part­ner­ship does not pass to the son; ins­tead, the heirs retain a cla­im for com­pen­sa­ti­on, which is often based on a con­trac­tual­ly redu­ced com­pen­sa­ti­on formula.

In the case of a GmbH, shares are free­ly inhe­ri­ta­ble (sec­tion 15(1) of the GmbH Act). Howe­ver, the artic­les of asso­cia­ti­on may sti­pu­la­te that shares must be rede­e­med from heirs or trans­fer­red to spe­ci­fic per­sons. For this reason, the will and the artic­les of asso­cia­ti­on must be con­side­red side by side – not just once, but when­ever the­re is a chan­ge in the group of share­hol­ders or within the family.

Transfer during one’s lifetime: anticipated succession

Many busi­ness owners pass on their busi­ness not only upon their death, but whilst they are still ali­ve. This has tan­gi­ble advan­ta­ges. The suc­ces­sor can be trai­ned in the busi­ness, the trans­fer­or can over­see the han­do­ver, and the tax allo­wan­ces can be uti­li­sed on mul­ti­ple occa­si­ons. A child may recei­ve 400,000 euros tax-free from each parent every ten years (Sec­tions 14 and 16 of the Inhe­ri­tance Tax Act (ErbStG)).

Usufruct and maintenance payments

Peo­p­le who hand over the reins often want to remain cover­ed. The­re are two com­mon ways of doing this. In the case of Usu­fruct sub­ject to reser­va­ti­on the trans­fer­or reta­ins the inco­me from the trans­fer­red assets. In prin­ci­ple, the usu­fruct redu­ces the value of the gift for the pur­po­ses of gift tax; howe­ver, whe­re busi­ness assets are exempt, this reduc­tion is limited.

In the con­text of busi­ness assets, usu­fruct is a sen­si­ti­ve issue for tax pur­po­ses. In the case of a sole trader, the Fede­ral Fis­cal Court rules out a trans­fer at book value if the trans­fer­or reta­ins the usu­fruct and con­ti­nues to run the busi­ness (BFH, jud­ge­ment of 29 Janu­ary 2025, X R 35/19). The tax aut­ho­ri­ties fol­low this ruling. In the case of shares in part­ner­ships, this arran­ge­ment remains pos­si­ble pro­vi­ded that the trans­fe­ree beco­mes a co-part­ner for tax pur­po­ses despi­te the usu­fruct. Exemp­ti­on from gift tax also depends on this.

At Care ser­vices The trans­fe­ree pays the trans­fer­or regu­lar sums for the rest of the transferor’s life. The trans­fe­ree may deduct the­se pay­ments as spe­cial expen­ses (Sec­tion 10(1a)(2) of the Inco­me Tax Act (EStG)), whilst the trans­fer­or, in return, pays tax on them as other inco­me. Only cer­tain trans­fers qua­li­fy for this bene­fit: a busi­ness or part of a busi­ness, a part­ner­ship inte­rest or a share in a limi­t­ed lia­bi­li­ty com­pa­ny (GmbH) of at least 50 per cent, pro­vi­ded that the trans­fer­or was a mana­ging direc­tor and the trans­fe­ree takes over this role.

Agree on rights of recovery

A trans­fer agree­ment should spe­ci­fy when the trans­fer­or may recla­im the busi­ness: for exam­p­le, if the trans­fe­ree dies befo­re the trans­fer­or, beco­mes insol­vent or sells the busi­ness wit­hout the transferor’s con­sent. If a gift is retur­ned on the basis of such a con­trac­tu­al right of recla­ma­ti­on, gift tax is wai­ved with retroac­ti­ve effect (Sec­tion 29(1)(1) of the Ger­man Inhe­ri­tance Tax Act (ErbStG)). The grounds for recla­ma­ti­on should be spe­ci­fied in detail. An unrest­ric­ted right of revo­ca­ti­on, which the trans­fer­or may exer­cise at any time, may result in the trans­fe­ree not being regard­ed as a co-part­ner for tax purposes.

For inco­me tax pur­po­ses, it is pos­si­ble to trans­fer a busi­ness or a co-partner’s share free of char­ge at book value (Sec­tion 6(3) of the Inco­me Tax Act). Hid­den reser­ves are then not rea­li­sed. Howe­ver, this only appli­es if the struc­tu­re is cor­rect. For more on this, see the sec­tion „Che­cking the struc­tu­re and legal form befo­re the handover“.

Claims to a compulsory share as a liquidity risk

Child­ren who are excluded from the suc­ces­si­on by will do not go away emp­ty-han­ded. They are entit­led to the com­pul­so­ry por­ti­on, that is, half of their sta­tu­to­ry share of the estate (Sec­tion 2303 of the Ger­man Civil Code (BGB)). The com­pul­so­ry por­ti­on is a purely mone­ta­ry cla­im and beco­mes due upon the testator’s death. An heir may only request a defer­ral under very spe­ci­fic con­di­ti­ons (Sec­tion 2331a of the Ger­man Civil Code (BGB)).

A sam­ple cal­cu­la­ti­on: A wido­wed entre­pre­neur lea­ves behind two child­ren. His estate con­sists of the busi­ness, which is valued at two mil­li­on euros. The daugh­ter beco­mes the sole heir. Under the law, the son would have inhe­ri­ted half; his sta­tu­to­ry share is the­r­e­fo­re a quar­ter of the estate: 500,000 euros, in cash. The daugh­ter must rai­se this sum, often from a busi­ness who­se assets are tied up in machi­nery, buil­dings and receiv­a­bles. In addi­ti­on, the­re are fre­quent­ly dis­pu­tes over the value of the busi­ness, on which the sta­tu­to­ry share is based.

Even gifts made during one’s life­time do not pro­vi­de com­ple­te pro­tec­tion. Gifts made within the last ten years pri­or to the ope­ning of the suc­ces­si­on are taken into account via the cla­im for a sup­ple­men­ta­ry com­pul­so­ry por­ti­on, with the value taken into account being redu­ced by one-tenth each year (Sec­tion 2325 of the Ger­man Civil Code (BGB)). If the donor reser­ves a com­pre­hen­si­ve right of usu­fruct, this peri­od gene­ral­ly does not even begin to run, accor­ding to the case law of the Fede­ral Court of Justice.

What can be sorted out in advance

  • Wai­ver of the sta­tu­to­ry share in return for a sett­le­ment: The child who is lea­ving the fami­ly wai­ves their sta­tu­to­ry share by means of a nota­ri­sed deed (Sec­tion 2346(2) of the Ger­man Civil Code (BGB)) and recei­ves com­pen­sa­ti­on in return. The wai­ver may be limi­t­ed to the business.
  • Sett­le­ment from other assets: Pro­per­ty, secu­ri­ties or a life insu­rance poli­cy can cover the sett­le­ment so that the busi­ness is not burdened.

For tax pur­po­ses, it depends on who pays the sett­le­ment. If the busi­ness owner pays it them­sel­ves, it is regard­ed as a gift to the child who has wai­ved their cla­im (Sec­tion 7(1)(5) of the Inhe­ri­tance Tax Act) and is set off against that child’s tax-free allo­wan­ce of 400,000 euros. This gift is taken into account in the ten-year assess­ment peri­od. If, on the other hand, the sis­ter pays it as the suc­ces­sor, the Fede­ral Fis­cal Court tre­ats this as a gift bet­ween siblings: Tax class II appli­es, with an allo­wan­ce of only 20,000 euros (Fede­ral Fis­cal Court, jud­ge­ment of 10 May 2017, II R 25/15). The ques­ti­on of who pays should the­r­e­fo­re be cla­ri­fied befo­re the agree­ment is signed.

Inheritance tax on business assets

Under cer­tain con­di­ti­ons, busi­ness assets are lar­ge­ly exempt from inhe­ri­tance and gift tax (Sec­tions 13a and 13b of the Inhe­ri­tance Tax Act (ErbStG)). This exemp­ti­on appli­es to sole trad­ers, shares in com­mer­cial part­ner­ships and shares in com­pa­nies. In the case of a limi­t­ed lia­bi­li­ty com­pa­ny (GmbH), this only appli­es if the trans­fer­or holds more than a 25 per cent sta­ke or has ente­red into a poo­ling agree­ment with other share­hol­ders. The legis­la­tor distin­gu­is­hes bet­ween two models:

  • Exemp­ti­on from the rule: 85 per cent of the assets trans­fer­red remain tax-free. The busi­ness must be retai­ned for five years, and the total wage bill during this peri­od must amount to at least 400 per cent of the initi­al wage bill.
  • Opti­on exemp­ti­on: 100 per cent remains tax-free. The hol­ding peri­od is seven years, and the mini­mum wage total is 700 per cent. A fur­ther con­di­ti­on is that admi­nis­tra­ti­ve assets must account for no more than 20 per cent.

For smal­ler busi­nesses, gra­dua­ted requi­re­ments app­ly: for busi­nesses with up to five employees, the pay­roll test does not app­ly. For busi­nesses with six to ten employees, 250 per cent is suf­fi­ci­ent (optio­nal exemp­ti­on: 500 per cent); for tho­se with ele­ven to 15 employees, 300 per cent is suf­fi­ci­ent (optio­nal exemp­ti­on: 565 per cent).

Admi­nis­tra­ti­ve assets such as pro­per­ties let to third par­ties, secu­ri­ties or sur­plus liquid assets are, as a rule, not eli­gi­ble for reli­ef. If his share is 90 per cent or more, the reli­ef is com­ple­te­ly with­drawn. For very lar­ge acqui­si­ti­ons invol­ving more than 26 mil­li­on euros of exempt assets, addi­tio­nal rules app­ly: the exemp­ti­on allo­wan­ce is pha­sed out, or the acqui­rer must app­ly for a remis­si­on and, to do so, must pro­ve that they are unable to pay the tax from half of their remai­ning available assets.

The Articles of Association as a tax factor

Fami­ly busi­nesses orga­nis­ed as part­ner­ships or com­pa­nies may be eli­gi­ble for a reduc­tion of up to 30 per cent pri­or to the actu­al exemp­ti­on (Sec­tion 13a(9) of the Inhe­ri­tance Tax Act). This is sub­ject to the artic­les of asso­cia­ti­on sti­pu­la­ting three con­di­ti­ons: with­dra­wals and dis­tri­bu­ti­ons are limi­t­ed to a maxi­mum of 37.5 per cent of the pro­fit after tax; shares may only be trans­fer­red to co-share­hol­ders, rela­ti­ves or a fami­ly trust; and the sever­ance pay­ment upon with­dra­wal is below the mar­ket value. The­se pro­vi­si­ons must alre­a­dy be in place two years pri­or to the death or the gift and must be com­pli­ed with for 20 years the­re­af­ter. This illus­tra­tes par­ti­cu­lar­ly cle­ar­ly how clo­se­ly com­pa­ny law and inhe­ri­tance tax are linked.

What overturns the exemption retrospectively

The tax exemp­ti­on is sub­ject to con­di­ti­ons which must be met after the trans­fer. It will be with­drawn in full or in part if, during the hol­ding period:

  • the busi­ness is sold or wound up,
  • if key assets essen­ti­al to ope­ra­ti­ons are sold,
  • the mini­mum wage total is not met, for exam­p­le due to staff cuts fol­lo­wing the takeover,
  • with­dra­wals that exceed depo­sits and pro­fits by more than 150,000 euros.

Latest: The Federal Constitutional Court is reviewing inheritance tax

In mid-Octo­ber 2026, the Fede­ral Con­sti­tu­tio­nal Court will hear two cases con­cer­ning inhe­ri­tance tax. The first case con­cerns the valua­ti­on of pro­per­ty, per­so­nal allo­wan­ces and tax rates (Ref. 1 BvF 1/23), whilst the second con­cerns the pre­fe­ren­ti­al tre­at­ment of busi­ness assets over pri­va­te assets (Ref. 1 BvR 804/22). A ruling is not expec­ted until seve­ral weeks or months after the oral hearing.

In pre­vious rulings, the court has set the legis­la­tu­re a dead­line for enac­ting new legis­la­ti­on; the exis­ting law remain­ed in force until then. Experts gene­ral­ly expect stric­ter rules for busi­ness assets. Our assess­ment: The­re is no need to eit­her rush ahead with a trans­fer that was alre­a­dy plan­ned or put it on hold. Howe­ver, it makes sen­se to draft trans­fer agree­ments in such a way that they can adapt to chan­ging cir­cum­s­tances, for exam­p­le through claw­back or adjus­t­ment clauses.

Check the structure and legal form before the handover

In addi­ti­on to inhe­ri­tance tax, the­re are inco­me tax risks asso­cia­ted with suc­ces­si­on that often only beco­me appa­rent after the death of the test­a­tor. Two sce­na­ri­os are par­ti­cu­lar­ly com­mon in small and medi­um-sized enterprises.

Special business assets

The busi­ness pre­mi­ses are owned per­so­nal­ly by the part­ner and are let to his limi­t­ed part­ner­ship. For tax pur­po­ses, they the­r­e­fo­re con­sti­tu­te spe­cial busi­ness assets. If the part­ner­ship agree­ment con­ta­ins a qua­li­fied suc­ces­si­on clau­se, the part­ner­ship share pas­ses only to the suc­ces­sor, whilst the pre­mi­ses pass to all the heirs. The por­ti­on of the pro­per­ty attri­bu­ta­ble to the other heirs is dee­med to have been with­drawn. The hid­den reser­ves in this por­ti­on beco­me sub­ject to inco­me tax wit­hout any cash pay­ment being made.

Business split

The situa­ti­on is simi­lar in the case of a busi­ness split: the pre­mi­ses are owned pri­va­te­ly by the busi­ness owner and are let to his or her limi­t­ed lia­bi­li­ty com­pa­ny (GmbH), which runs the busi­ness. If, upon suc­ces­si­on, one child inhe­rits the GmbH and ano­ther the pre­mi­ses – whe­ther by gift or will – the tax inter­de­pen­dence cea­ses. This is trea­ted as a ces­sa­ti­on of busi­ness, and the hid­den reser­ves in the pro­per­ty and in the GmbH shares are sub­ject to tax.

Tackle restructuring in good time

Both pro­blems can be resol­ved if they are iden­ti­fied in advan­ce. In the case of a KG, the land can often be trans­fer­red to the company’s assets at book value. In the case of a busi­ness split, the pro­per­ty is often trans­fer­red to a com­mer­cial GmbH & Co. KG so that it remains busi­ness assets even wit­hout any inter­de­pen­dence. In addi­ti­on, it may be advi­sa­ble to spin off admi­nis­tra­ti­ve assets so that the busi­ness com­pli­es with the tax exemp­ti­on thres­holds. Lock-up peri­ods and land trans­fer tax must be taken into account in each case. Such steps must be taken befo­re the han­do­ver, as res­truc­tu­ring mea­su­res car­ri­ed out after­wards may affect the hol­ding peri­ods. Find out more on our page about Right of con­ver­si­on.

Legal and tax services under one roof

Busi­ness suc­ces­si­on is not a sin­gle con­tract, but a packa­ge com­pri­sing a will, artic­les of asso­cia­ti­on, a trans­fer agree­ment and tax plan­ning. The indi­vi­du­al ele­ments are inter­lin­ked. That is why we work them out together.

Ina Ree­se is a soli­ci­tor, a spe­cia­list in tax law and a tax advi­ser. We are revie­w­ing the Artic­les of Asso­cia­ti­on, cal­cu­la­te the tax impli­ca­ti­ons of various opti­ons and coor­di­na­te the con­tracts. Whe­re nota­ri­sa­ti­on is requi­red – for exam­p­le, in the case of a wai­ver of the sta­tu­to­ry share or the trans­fer of GmbH shares – we prepa­re the rele­vant docu­ments and liai­se with the notary’s office. We pro­vi­de ongo­ing tax sup­port fol­lo­wing the han­do­ver, inclu­ding moni­to­ring the wage bill and reten­ti­on peri­ods, as part of our Tax advice.

Frequently asked questions about business succession

When should you start planning your succession?

Ide­al­ly, seve­ral years befo­re the plan­ned han­do­ver. Many pro­vi­si­ons take effect over time: tax allo­wan­ces are rene­wed every ten years, the sup­ple­ment to the com­pul­so­ry share is pha­sed out over ten years, and clau­ses in the artic­les of asso­cia­ti­on rela­ting to the fami­ly busi­ness allo­wan­ce must have been in place for two years beforehand.

Is a will sufficient for business succession?

In the case of sole trad­ers, it can be a key com­po­nent. In the case of part­ner­ships, howe­ver, it is the part­ner­ship agree­ment that deter­mi­nes who beco­mes a part­ner. In the case of a limi­t­ed lia­bi­li­ty com­pa­ny (GmbH), the artic­les of asso­cia­ti­on may con­tain rules on the redemp­ti­on or trans­fer of shares. Unless a will is brought into line with the­se agree­ments, it may well come to nothing.

Is tax payable on a transfer of assets during the owner’s lifetime?

The trans­fer is sub­ject to gift tax. The same per­so­nal allo­wan­ces and exemp­ti­on rules app­ly as for inhe­ri­tance tax. Whe­re busi­ness assets are trea­ted as favou­red assets and the trans­fer is struc­tu­red cor­rect­ly, the tax may the­r­e­fo­re be wai­ved in full or to a lar­ge ext­ent. For inco­me tax pur­po­ses, a trans­fer at book value is pos­si­ble if the struc­tu­re is cor­rect. Howe­ver, a usu­fruct with a right of reser­va­ti­on in respect of a sole trader’s busi­ness pre­cludes this.

Should we broadcast it straight away because of the proceedings in Karlsruhe?

We do not recom­mend brin­ging the trans­fer for­ward pre­ma­tu­re­ly. Howe­ver, a trans­fer that was alre­a­dy plan­ned can be car­ri­ed out in a sen­si­ble man­ner, pro­vi­ded that the appli­ca­ble law remains in force. Recoup­ment and adjus­t­ment clau­ses pro­vi­de addi­tio­nal secu­ri­ty in this regard.

In summary

  • In the absence of any pro­vi­si­ons, the estate is inhe­ri­ted by a com­mu­ni­ty of heirs, which often brings ope­ra­ti­ons to a standstill.
  • The will and the artic­les of asso­cia­ti­on must be con­sis­tent with one ano­ther; other­wi­se, the artic­les of asso­cia­ti­on shall prevail.
  • Trans­fer­ring assets during one’s life­time allows for a pha­sed han­do­ver and the reu­se of tax allowances.
  • Claims to a com­pul­so­ry share by heirs who are giving up their inhe­ri­tance can be sett­led in advan­ce by means of a wai­ver and a settlement.
  • The exemp­ti­on of busi­ness assets is sub­ject to hol­ding peri­ods, total wage bills and the pro­por­ti­on of admi­nis­tra­ti­ve assets.
  • Sepa­ra­te busi­ness assets and the divi­si­on of a busi­ness can result in high inco­me tax lia­bi­li­ties if not pro­per­ly planned.

Are you plan­ning to hand over your busi­ness? During an initi­al con­sul­ta­ti­on las­ting around 15 minu­tes, we’ll assess whe­re you’re at and which issues need to be addres­sed first. Get in touch now

Sources

You might also be interested in this