Ina Ree­se Tax & Legal Prac­ti­ce – Flens­burg | Harrislee

Tax liability of foreign companies in Germany: When does a permanent establishment arise?

Con­duc­ting busi­ness in Ger­ma­ny does not auto­ma­ti­cal­ly con­sti­tu­te a per­ma­nent estab­lish­ment. What real­ly matters. 
Tax liability of foreign companies in Germany: When does a permanent establishment arise?

Tax liability of foreign companies in Germany: When does a permanent establishment arise?

A for­eign com­pa­ny may beco­me lia­ble for tax in Ger­ma­ny even if its regis­tered office and manage­ment remain abroad. The decisi­ve con­nec­ting fac­tor is the per­ma­nent estab­lish­ment. Howe­ver, not every busi­ness acti­vi­ty in Ger­ma­ny auto­ma­ti­cal­ly con­sti­tu­tes such a per­ma­nent establishment.

What is a permanent establishment under German law?

Ger­man tax law defi­nes a per­ma­nent estab­lish­ment in Sec­tion 12 of the Ger­man Fis­cal Code (AO) as a fixed place of busi­ness or faci­li­ty used by the enter­pri­se for the pur­po­ses of its busi­ness. Typi­cal examp­les include bran­ches, offices, warehou­ses and work­shops. Con­s­truc­tion and instal­la­ti­on pro­jects may also be regard­ed as per­ma­nent estab­lish­ments under cer­tain conditions.

Howe­ver, it is not the for­mal desi­gna­ti­on of a faci­li­ty that is decisi­ve, but its actu­al use. Accor­ding to estab­lished case law, the Fede­ral Fis­cal Court (BFH) requi­res a per­ma­nent con­nec­tion to a spe­ci­fic loca­ti­on, a cer­tain dura­ti­on, busi­ness use and a power of dis­po­sal over the pre­mi­ses that is not mere­ly tem­po­ra­ry (BFH, jud­ge­ment of 7 June 2023, Ref. I R 47/20).

The right of dis­po­sal need not be based on owner­ship or a lea­se held in the company’s own name. Pre­mi­ses belon­ging to a con­trac­ted ser­vice pro­vi­der may also suf­fice if the for­eign com­pa­ny actual­ly and per­ma­nent­ly uses them for its own pur­po­ses (Fede­ral Fis­cal Court, jud­ge­ment of 23 March 2022, ref. III R 35/20). Mere­ly an occa­sio­nal pre­sence on third-par­ty pre­mi­ses, howe­ver, is not sufficient.

A national examination alone is not enough

Even if a per­ma­nent estab­lish­ment exists under Ger­man law, that should not be the end of the ana­ly­sis. If the­re is a dou­ble taxa­ti­on agree­ment (DTA) bet­ween Ger­ma­ny and the coun­try in which the com­pa­ny is based, this must then be exami­ned. DTAs con­tain their own defi­ni­ti­ons of ‘per­ma­nent estab­lish­ment’, which may dif­fer from the Ger­man defi­ni­ti­on. Only the spe­ci­fic agree­ment deter­mi­nes whe­ther, and to what ext­ent, Ger­ma­ny is entit­led to tax the company’s profits.

This is par­ti­cu­lar­ly rele­vant in the case of con­s­truc­tion and instal­la­ti­on pro­jects: Ger­man law sti­pu­la­tes a mini­mum dura­ti­on of six months, though some dou­ble taxa­ti­on agree­ments devia­te from this. It is the­r­e­fo­re not per­mis­si­ble to app­ly the Ger­man time limits across the board to the pro­vi­si­ons of the agreement.

Practical example

A Hun­ga­ri­an com­pa­ny (com­pa­ra­ble to a Ger­man GmbH) has its regis­tered office in Hun­ga­ry but per­ma­nent­ly employs staff in a ren­ted office in Ger­ma­ny. The­se employees look after cli­ents and pro­vi­de tech­ni­cal ser­vices. The com­pa­ny has per­ma­nent use of the pre­mi­ses under the terms of its con­trac­tu­al agreement.

In this case, under Sec­tion 12 of the Ger­man Fis­cal Code (AO), the­re are strong indi­ca­ti­ons that a Ger­man per­ma­nent estab­lish­ment exists. The next step is to exami­ne the dou­ble taxa­ti­on agree­ment bet­ween Ger­ma­ny and Hun­ga­ry befo­re any spe­ci­fic tax lia­bi­li­ties arise.

Don’t forget your registration obligations

Whe­re a per­ma­nent estab­lish­ment is estab­lished, cer­tain report­ing obli­ga­ti­ons must be obser­ved. Under Sec­tion 138 of the Ger­man Fis­cal Code (AO), the ope­ning of a per­ma­nent estab­lish­ment must be noti­fied to the rele­vant local aut­ho­ri­ty, which will then inform the tax office. In addi­ti­on, tax regis­tra­ti­on with the tax office must be initia­ted. Fur­ther­mo­re, a busi­ness regis­tra­ti­on under Sec­tion 14 of the Trade Regu­la­ti­on Act (GewO) may be required.

Check VAT separately

The per­ma­nent estab­lish­ment for inco­me tax pur­po­ses and the tre­at­ment for VAT pur­po­ses are not iden­ti­cal. Of par­ti­cu­lar importance is Sec­tion 13b of the Value Added Tax Act (UStG), which con­ta­ins spe­cial pro­vi­si­ons for for­eign busi­nesses. The exis­tence of a per­ma­nent estab­lish­ment in Ger­ma­ny does not auto­ma­ti­cal­ly mean that a per­son is dee­med to be resi­dent in Ger­ma­ny for VAT pur­po­ses in respect of every tran­sac­tion. The VAT impli­ca­ti­ons should the­r­e­fo­re be ana­ly­sed separately.

Any for­eign com­pa­ny ope­ra­ting in Ger­ma­ny, or wis­hing to do so, should seek cla­ri­fi­ca­ti­on on the issue of per­ma­nent estab­lish­ments from an ear­ly stage from a tax law per­spec­ti­ve. The con­se­quen­ces of an incor­rect assess­ment ran­ge from having to pay back taxes to brea­ches of regis­tra­ti­on obligations.

Source: Hau­fe: Tax

This post and the accom­pany­ing image were crea­ted with the help of AI and have been edi­to­ri­al­ly reviewed.

You might also be interested in this