Ina Ree­se Tax & Legal Prac­ti­ce – Flens­burg | Harrislee

Bullying in the workplace: What employers need to know and do

Bullying in the workplace: What employers need to know and do

Con­flicts bet­ween col­le­agues are part and par­cel of ever­y­day working life. But at what point does a dis­pu­te beco­me actu­al bul­ly­ing, and what obli­ga­ti­ons does an employ­er have when they beco­me awa­re of it? An over­view of the legal situation.

What exactly is bullying?

Bul­ly­ing is not a term defi­ned by law, nor does it con­sti­tu­te an inde­pen­dent basis for a cla­im in court. The Fede­ral Labour Court (BAG) descri­bes bul­ly­ing as the sys­te­ma­tic hosti­li­ty, harass­ment or dis­cri­mi­na­ti­on against employees by col­le­agues or supe­ri­ors. In 2018, the Court of Jus­ti­ce of the Euro­pean Uni­on cla­ri­fied that the con­duct in ques­ti­on must be impro­per and must occur repea­ted­ly or sys­te­ma­ti­cal­ly over a pro­lon­ged period.

The key word here is ‘sys­te­ma­tic’. One-off con­flicts, an occa­sio­nal­ly harsh tone or an uncom­for­ta­ble ins­truc­tion from a line mana­ger are gene­ral­ly not suf­fi­ci­ent to con­sti­tu­te bul­ly­ing. In a recent case, the Mann­heim Labour Court cla­ri­fied that con­flicts in the work­place are ine­vi­ta­ble and that not every ins­tance of inter­per­so­nal ten­si­on should auto­ma­ti­cal­ly be clas­si­fied as work­place bul­ly­ing. The court drew the line at acts of inti­mi­da­ti­on, hosti­li­ty and humiliation.

Duty of care: Employers must take action

As soon as an employ­er recei­ves con­cre­te evi­dence of work­place bul­ly­ing, they are obli­ged to take action. This is based on their duty of care under the employ­ment con­tract and the pro­tec­tion of employees’ per­so­nal rights. The Schles­wig-Hol­stein Regio­nal Labour Court has recent­ly reaf­firm­ed this principle.

Depen­ding on the seve­ri­ty of the case, the employ­er has various opti­ons at their dis­po­sal. In prac­ti­ce, the step-by-step plan works as follows:

  • A repri­mand or war­ning for the employee who is bul­ly­ing others
  • For­mal warning
  • Trans­fer of the per­son responsible
  • Dis­mis­sal as a last resort

If the employ­er takes no action despi­te being awa­re of the situa­ti­on, they are brea­ching their duty of care. This can pro­ve costly.

Compensation for damages and compensation for pain and suffering as a consequence

In such cases, vic­tims of work­place bul­ly­ing may cla­im both dama­ges and com­pen­sa­ti­on for pain and suf­fe­ring. Claims for dama­ges may ari­se from the employ­ment con­tract its­elf, but also from the law of tort. If a line mana­ger enga­ges in bul­ly­ing beha­viour, this con­duct is often attri­bu­ted direct­ly to the employer.

If the Gene­ral Equal Tre­at­ment Act (AGG) comes into play becau­se the bul­ly­ing is lin­ked to a pro­tec­ted cha­rac­te­ristic – such as age, eth­nic ori­gin, a disa­bi­li­ty or sexu­al iden­ti­ty – addi­tio­nal duties of care and grounds for claims app­ly. Howe­ver, the AGG does not cover every form of bul­ly­ing, but only dis­cri­mi­na­ti­on on the grounds of the cha­rac­te­ristics express­ly mentioned.

What is not bullying

In prac­ti­ce, many claims fail becau­se the facts of the case are not set out pre­cis­e­ly enough in court or becau­se the defi­ni­ti­on has been inter­pre­ted too broad­ly. For exam­p­le, an unlawful dis­mis­sal does not in its­elf con­sti­tu­te an act of work­place bul­ly­ing. Nor are ins­truc­tions issued by the employ­er within the scope of their mana­ge­ri­al aut­ho­ri­ty gene­ral­ly regard­ed as work­place bul­ly­ing, pro­vi­ded they are not mani­fest­ly arbi­tra­ry or vexatious.

What does this mean for those affected and for employers?

Employ­ers must take com­plaints about bul­ly­ing serious­ly, docu­ment them and respond prompt­ly. Tho­se who turn a blind eye risk lia­bi­li­ty claims. For tho­se affec­ted: record inci­dents in wri­ting as accu­ra­te­ly and prompt­ly as pos­si­ble, inclu­ding the date, tho­se invol­ved and a detail­ed descrip­ti­on of what hap­pen­ed. In the event of a dis­pu­te, it is advi­sa­ble to seek legal advice, as the hurd­les in court are high.

This post and the accom­pany­ing image were crea­ted with the help of AI and have been edi­to­ri­al­ly reviewed.

You might also be interested in this