{"id":1655,"date":"2026-10-19T04:05:02","date_gmt":"2026-10-19T02:05:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kanzlei-reese.de\/?p=1655"},"modified":"2026-10-19T04:05:02","modified_gmt":"2026-10-19T02:05:02","slug":"knp-141-d2f08369fe25","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kanzlei-reese.de\/da\/knp-141-d2f08369fe25\/","title":{"rendered":"BGH: Ingen ret til pro\u00advi\u00adsi\u00adon for ejen\u00addoms\u00adad\u00admi\u00adnis\u00adtra\u00adto\u00adrer, der samt\u00adidig for\u00admid\u00adler lejligheder"},"content":{"rendered":"

Ejen\u00addoms\u00adad\u00admi\u00adnis\u00adtra\u00adti\u00adons\u00adsels\u00adka\u00adber, der samt\u00adidig fun\u00adge\u00adrer som ejen\u00addomsm\u00e6g\u00adle\u00adre, mis\u00adter deres ret til pro\u00advi\u00adsi\u00adon. Det\u00adte har For\u00adbunds\u00addom\u00ads\u00adto\u00adlen pr\u00e6cis\u00ade\u00adret i en dom af 21. maj 2026 (BGH, sag nr. I ZR 224\/25). Afg\u00f8\u00adrel\u00adsen vedr\u00f8\u00adrer ikke kun pro\u00advi\u00adsio\u00adner, som leje\u00adre beta\u00adler, men udtrykke\u00adligt ogs\u00e5 dem, som udle\u00adje\u00adre beta\u00adler til ejendomsadministratoren.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hvad var der sket?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

En ejer hav\u00adde over\u00addra\u00adget omkring 129 boli\u00adger til et admi\u00adnis\u00adtra\u00adti\u00adons\u00adsels\u00adkab. I admi\u00adnis\u00adtra\u00adti\u00adons\u00adaf\u00adta\u00adlen var det aftalt, at admi\u00adnis\u00adtra\u00adti\u00adons\u00adsels\u00adka\u00adbet ogs\u00e5 skul\u00adle fin\u00adde nye leje\u00adre og for hver nyud\u00adle\u00adj\u00adning mod\u00adta\u00adge en pro\u00advi\u00adsi\u00adon p\u00e5 to m\u00e5ne\u00adders leje ekskl. omkost\u00adnin\u00adger, dog med et loft p\u00e5 10.000 euro om \u00e5ret. I l\u00f8bet af tre \u00e5r blev 13 lej\u00adlig\u00adhe\u00adder genud\u00adle\u00adjet, og eje\u00adren betal\u00adte i alt omkring 16.800 euro i pro\u00advi\u00adsi\u00adon. Da kon\u00adtrak\u00adten udl\u00f8b, kr\u00e6\u00adve\u00adde hun pen\u00adgene tilbage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Mens Land\u00adge\u00adricht Kre\u00adfeld (dom af 22. maj 2024, sag nr. 7 O 15\/24) end\u00adnu afvis\u00adte kra\u00advet om til\u00adb\u00ada\u00adge\u00adbe\u00adta\u00adling, gav OLG D\u00fcs\u00adsel\u00addorf (dom af 24. okto\u00adber 2025, sagsnr. 7 U 101\/24) og til sidst For\u00adbunds\u00addom\u00ads\u00adto\u00adlen (BGH) eje\u00adren medhold.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Det juridiske grundlag<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Det afg\u00f8\u00adren\u00adde er loven om bolig\u00adfor\u00admidling, kort sagt WoVer\u00admittG. \u00a7 2, stk. 2, s\u00e6t\u00adning 1, nr. 2, i den\u00adne lov ude\u00adluk\u00adker krav p\u00e5 pro\u00advi\u00adsi\u00adon, hvis bolig\u00adfor\u00admid\u00adle\u00adren samt\u00adidig er boli\u00adgad\u00admi\u00adnis\u00adtra\u00adtor. Indtil afg\u00f8\u00adrel\u00adsen fra For\u00adbunds\u00addom\u00ads\u00adto\u00adlen (BGH) var det omstridt, om det\u00adte for\u00adbud kun gjaldt over for leje\u00adre eller ogs\u00e5 over for udlejere.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For\u00adbunds\u00addom\u00ads\u00adto\u00adlen har nu taget klart stil\u00adling: Da bestem\u00admel\u00adsen ikke udtrykke\u00adligt tager udgangs\u00adpunkt i begre\u00adbet \u00bbboligs\u00ad\u00f8\u00adgen\u00adde\u00ab, er den bevid\u00adst for\u00admu\u00adler\u00adet bredt. Ret\u00adten begrunde\u00adrer det\u00adte med, at en udle\u00adjer \u00f8ko\u00adno\u00admisk set kun\u00adne vide\u00adre\u00adsen\u00adde pro\u00advi\u00adsi\u00adons\u00adom\u00adkost\u00adnin\u00adger\u00adne til leje\u00adren via lejen. Der\u00admed ville leje\u00adren indi\u00adrek\u00adte alli\u00adge\u00advel kom\u00adme til at afhol\u00adde pro\u00advi\u00adsio\u00adnen, hvil\u00adket lov\u00adgi\u00adve\u00adren netop \u00f8ns\u00adke\u00adde at forhindre.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hvad betyder det i praksis?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

For ejen\u00addoms\u00adad\u00admi\u00adnis\u00adtra\u00adti\u00adons\u00adsels\u00adka\u00adber, der hid\u00adtil har mod\u00adta\u00adget pro\u00advi\u00adsi\u00adon for for\u00admidling af lej\u00adlig\u00adhe\u00adder fra deres bolig\u00adbe\u00adstand, er kon\u00adsek\u00advens\u00ader\u00adne bety\u00adde\u00adli\u00adge. Aller\u00ade\u00adde udbe\u00adtal\u00adte pro\u00advi\u00adsio\u00adner kan kr\u00e6\u00adves til\u00adb\u00ada\u00adge\u00adbe\u00adtalt, og det med til\u00adb\u00ada\u00adge\u00advir\u00adken\u00adde kraft inden for den lov\u00adbe\u00adstem\u00adte for\u00e6l\u00addel\u00adses\u00adfrist. Den\u00adne udg\u00f8r tre \u00e5r, reg\u00adnet fra udgan\u00adgen af det \u00e5r, hvor kra\u00advet ops\u00adtod, og hvor udle\u00adje\u00adren hav\u00adde eller bur\u00adde have haft kends\u00adkab hertil.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ved store bolig\u00adbe\u00adstan\u00adde med regel\u00adm\u00e6s\u00adsi\u00adge genud\u00adle\u00adj\u00adnin\u00adger kan der hur\u00adtigt ops\u00adt\u00e5 til\u00adb\u00ada\u00adge\u00adbe\u00adta\u00adlings\u00adbel\u00f8b i fem- eller sek\u00adscif\u00adret st\u00f8rrelse.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Undtagelse: WEG-administrator<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

If\u00f8l\u00adge fast rets\u00adpraks\u00adis fra For\u00adbunds\u00addom\u00ads\u00adto\u00adlen (BGH) betrag\u00adtes en per\u00adson, der ude\u00adluk\u00adken\u00adde for\u00adval\u00adter f\u00e6l\u00adles\u00adare\u00ada\u00adler\u00adne i et ejer\u00adle\u00adj\u00adlig\u00adheds\u00adsels\u00adkab, ikke som admi\u00adnis\u00adtra\u00adtor for de enkel\u00adte lej\u00adlig\u00adhe\u00adder. S\u00e5dan\u00adne WEG-admi\u00adnis\u00adtra\u00adto\u00adrer m\u00e5 i prin\u00adcip\u00adpet fort\u00adsat kr\u00e6\u00adve pro\u00advi\u00adsi\u00adon for for\u00admidling af ejer\u00adle\u00adj\u00adlig\u00adhe\u00adder i deres bolig\u00adkom\u00adpl\u00adeks. Afg\u00f8\u00adren\u00adde er dog ogs\u00e5 her de n\u00f8jag\u00adti\u00adge kon\u00adtrakt\u00adm\u00e6s\u00adsi\u00adge afta\u00adler i det enkel\u00adte tilf\u00e6lde.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pas p\u00e5 fors\u00f8g p\u00e5 at omg\u00e5 reglerne<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

If\u00f8l\u00adge BGH l\u00f8ber man ind i den n\u00e6s\u00adte f\u00e6l\u00adde, hvis man for\u00ads\u00f8\u00adger at omg\u00e5 for\u00adbud\u00addet mod pro\u00advi\u00adsi\u00adon ved at for\u00adh\u00f8\u00adje det l\u00f8ben\u00adde admi\u00adnis\u00adtra\u00adti\u00adons\u00adho\u00adno\u00adrar eller ved at udli\u00adci\u00adte\u00adre m\u00e6g\u00adler\u00advirksom\u00adhe\u00adden til et dat\u00adter\u00adsels\u00adkab. Loven omfat\u00adter udtrykke\u00adligt ogs\u00e5 \u00f8ko\u00adno\u00admisk for\u00adbund\u00adne sels\u00adka\u00adber, og skjul\u00adte pro\u00advi\u00adsi\u00adons\u00adaf\u00adta\u00adler er gener\u00adelt ugyldige.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hvad forvaltere og ejere b\u00f8r g\u00f8re<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Eksis\u00adter\u00aden\u00adde for\u00advalt\u00adningsaf\u00adta\u00adler med pro\u00advi\u00adsi\u00adons\u00adklau\u00adsu\u00adler for nye leje\u00adm\u00e5l b\u00f8r hur\u00adtigst muligt gen\u00adnem\u00adg\u00e5s og om n\u00f8d\u00adven\u00addigt gen\u00adfor\u00adhand\u00adles. Her kr\u00e6\u00adves der takt og f\u00f8l\u00adsom\u00adhed, da en \u00e5ben dr\u00f8f\u00adtel\u00adse af emnet med udle\u00adjer\u00adne f\u00f8rst kan g\u00f8re dem opm\u00e6rk\u00adsom\u00adme p\u00e5 even\u00adtu\u00adel\u00adle krav om til\u00adb\u00ada\u00adge\u00adbe\u00adta\u00adling. Hvis man \u00f8ns\u00adker at v\u00e6re p\u00e5 den sik\u00adre side, b\u00f8r man s\u00f8ge juri\u00addisk r\u00e5dgivning.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kil\u00adde: Hau\u00adfe: Ejendomme<\/a><\/p><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Det\u00adte indl\u00e6g og bil\u00adle\u00addet til artik\u00adlen er udar\u00adbej\u00addet med hj\u00e6lp fra kunst\u00adig intel\u00adli\u00adgens og redak\u00adtio\u00adnelt gennemg\u00e5et.<\/p><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Dom fra For\u00adbunds\u00addom\u00ads\u00adto\u00adlen (BGH): Ejen\u00addoms\u00adad\u00admi\u00adnis\u00adtra\u00adto\u00adrer, der samt\u00adidig for\u00admid\u00adler udle\u00adj\u00adning af lej\u00adlig\u00adhe\u00adder, har ikke ret til pro\u00advi\u00adsi\u00adon \u2013 hel\u00adler ikke fra udlejeren.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":843,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"wp_typography_post_enhancements_disabled":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1655","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-mietrecht"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kanzlei-reese.de\/da\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1655","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kanzlei-reese.de\/da\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kanzlei-reese.de\/da\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kanzlei-reese.de\/da\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kanzlei-reese.de\/da\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1655"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kanzlei-reese.de\/da\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1655\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kanzlei-reese.de\/da\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/843"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kanzlei-reese.de\/da\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1655"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kanzlei-reese.de\/da\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1655"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kanzlei-reese.de\/da\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1655"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}