Hvis man bor i en ejer\u00adle\u00adj\u00adlig\u00adhed og \u00f8ns\u00adker at f\u00e5 instal\u00adler\u00adet et kli\u00adma\u00adan\u00adl\u00e6g, st\u00e5r man ofte over for et pro\u00adblem: Instal\u00adla\u00adtio\u00adnen af et s\u00e5kaldt split-kli\u00adma\u00adan\u00adl\u00e6g kr\u00e6\u00adver, at der bores hul i yder\u00adfa\u00adca\u00adden, og der\u00admed et indgreb i f\u00e6l\u00adles\u00adarea\u00adlet. Det kan ikke lade sig g\u00f8re uden sam\u00adtykke fra ejer\u00adfo\u00adren\u00adin\u00adgen. Men hvad nu, hvis ejer\u00adfo\u00adren\u00adin\u00adgen n\u00e6g\u00adter at give til\u00adla\u00addel\u00adse? For\u00adbunds\u00addom\u00ads\u00adto\u00adlen har nu pr\u00e6cis\u00ade\u00adret, at ejer\u00adle\u00adj\u00adlig\u00adhed\u00adse\u00adje\u00adre under vis\u00adse forud\u00ads\u00e6t\u00adnin\u00adger har en juri\u00addisk ret til at f\u00e5 tilladelsen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Et ejer\u00adpar i Ber\u00adlin ans\u00f8g\u00adte p\u00e5 et ejer\u00adfor\u00adsam\u00adlings\u00adm\u00f8\u00adde om til\u00adla\u00addel\u00adse til at instal\u00adle\u00adre et split-kli\u00adma\u00adan\u00adl\u00e6g p\u00e5 alta\u00adnen. Ans\u00f8gn\u00adin\u00adgen blev for\u00adkas\u00adtet, da der ikke var fler\u00adtal for den. Her\u00adef\u00adter anlag\u00adde ejer\u00adne en s\u00e5kaldt sags\u00adan\u00adl\u00e6g om erstat\u00adning af bes\u00adlut\u00adning, hvor\u00adved en dom\u00adstol kan tr\u00e6f\u00adfe den bes\u00adlut\u00adning, som ejer\u00adfo\u00adren\u00adin\u00adgen har afvist. Byret\u00adten afvis\u00adte i f\u00f8rs\u00adte omgang sags\u00adan\u00adl\u00e6g\u00adget, men lands\u00adret\u00adten gav sags\u00ad\u00f8\u00adger\u00adne med\u00adhold og udsted\u00adte til\u00adla\u00addel\u00adsen p\u00e5 vis\u00adse beting\u00adel\u00adser vedr\u00f8\u00adren\u00adde udf\u00f8\u00adrel\u00adse og brug. For\u00adbunds\u00addom\u00ads\u00adto\u00adlen (BGH) bekr\u00e6f\u00adte\u00adde den\u00adne afg\u00f8relse.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
I hen\u00adhold til loven om ejer\u00adle\u00adj\u00adlig\u00adhe\u00adder betrag\u00adtes instal\u00adla\u00adti\u00adon af et kli\u00adma\u00adan\u00adl\u00e6g med gen\u00adnem\u00adf\u00f8ring i faca\u00adden som en byg\u00adnings\u00adm\u00e6s\u00adsig \u00e6nd\u00adring, der kr\u00e6\u00adver en bes\u00adlut\u00adning fra ejer\u00adfo\u00adren\u00adin\u00adgen. Eje\u00adre har ret til til\u00adla\u00addel\u00adse, hvis de \u00f8vri\u00adge eje\u00adre ikke ved for\u00adan\u00adstalt\u00adnin\u00adgen fors\u00adtyr\u00adres ud over det, der er uund\u00adg\u00e5e\u00adligt i et ordent\u00adligt sam\u00adliv. S\u00e6r\u00adli\u00adge for\u00adan\u00adstalt\u00adnin\u00adger, s\u00e5som instal\u00adla\u00adti\u00adon af bar\u00adrie\u00adre\u00adfri adgan\u00adge eller oplad\u00adnings\u00admu\u00adlig\u00adhe\u00adder til elb\u00adi\u00adler, fal\u00adder ind under en s\u00e6r\u00ads\u00adkilt bestem\u00admel\u00adse. Et kli\u00adma\u00adan\u00adl\u00e6g h\u00f8rer ikke her\u00adtil, men kan alli\u00adge\u00advel v\u00e6re til\u00adla\u00addel\u00adse\u00adsp\u00adlig\u00adtigt og kr\u00e6\u00adve godkendelse.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
I den\u00adne sag hav\u00adde beboer\u00adne is\u00e6r hen\u00advist til mulig st\u00f8j fra drif\u00adten af appa\u00adra\u00adtet. Det afvis\u00adte For\u00adbunds\u00addom\u00ads\u00adto\u00adlen klart. Blot fryg\u00adte\u00adde st\u00f8\u00adj\u00adge\u00adner udg\u00f8r ikke en ulem\u00adpe, der beret\u00adti\u00adger et afs\u00adlag. Kun hvis det p\u00e5 for\u00adh\u00e5nd st\u00e5r fast, at der vil ops\u00adt\u00e5 uri\u00adme\u00adli\u00adge fors\u00adtyr\u00adrel\u00adser, kan til\u00adla\u00addel\u00adsen der\u00adfor n\u00e6g\u00adtes. I den kon\u00adkre\u00adte sag var appa\u00adra\u00adtet god\u00adkendt til det tyske mark\u00aded og i stand til at over\u00adhol\u00adde gr\u00e6n\u00adse\u00adv\u00e6r\u00addier\u00adne i de teknis\u00adke ret\u00adningslin\u00adjer for bes\u00adkyt\u00adtel\u00adse mod st\u00f8j. Desu\u00adden var den plan\u00adlag\u00adte mon\u00adte\u00adrings\u00adpla\u00adce\u00adring fle\u00adre meter v\u00e6k fra det n\u00e6r\u00admes\u00adte sovev\u00e6relsesvindue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
For\u00adbunds\u00addom\u00ads\u00adto\u00adlen underst\u00adre\u00adge\u00adde, at god\u00adken\u00addels\u00aden af instal\u00adla\u00adtio\u00adnen og sene\u00adre krav om afh\u00adj\u00e6l\u00adp\u00adning p\u00e5 grund af fak\u00adtisk st\u00f8\u00adj\u00adge\u00adner skal hol\u00addes adskilt fra hin\u00adan\u00adden. Skul\u00adle appa\u00adra\u00adtet under drift for\u00e5r\u00adsa\u00adge uac\u00adcep\u00adta\u00adbel st\u00f8j, kan de ber\u00f8r\u00adte eje\u00adre p\u00e5 grund\u00adlag af loven om ejer\u00adle\u00adj\u00adlig\u00adhe\u00adder eller den civi\u00adle lov\u00adbog kr\u00e6\u00adve, at bru\u00adgen oph\u00f8\u00adrer. Som regel vil det\u00adte dog ikke f\u00f8re til en fulds\u00adt\u00e6n\u00addig ned\u00adlu\u00adk\u00adning, men sna\u00adre\u00adre til tids\u00adm\u00e6s\u00adsi\u00adge begr\u00e6ns\u00adnin\u00adger i bru\u00adgen. Ejer\u00adfo\u00adren\u00adin\u00adgen kan ogs\u00e5 fast\u00ads\u00e6t\u00adte s\u00e5dan\u00adne bestem\u00admel\u00adser i husordenen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Eje\u00adre, der af ejer\u00adfo\u00adren\u00adin\u00adgen f\u00e5r afs\u00adlag p\u00e5 at instal\u00adle\u00adre et kli\u00adma\u00adan\u00adl\u00e6g, b\u00f8r ikke blot fin\u00adde sig i den\u00adne bes\u00adlut\u00adning. Under de ret\u00adte forud\u00ads\u00e6t\u00adnin\u00adger eksis\u00adte\u00adrer der en h\u00e5nd\u00adh\u00e6\u00adve\u00adlig ret til at f\u00e5 til\u00adla\u00addel\u00adsen. Den, der befin\u00adder sig i en s\u00e5dan situa\u00adti\u00adon, b\u00f8r f\u00e5 under\u00ads\u00f8gt, om det kon\u00adkre\u00adte afs\u00adlag er juri\u00addisk hold\u00adbart. I tvivl\u00adstil\u00adf\u00e6l\u00adde kan det beta\u00adle sig at s\u00f8ge juri\u00addisk r\u00e5d\u00adgiv\u00adning, inden der ind\u00adle\u00addes dyre og tids\u00adkr\u00e6\u00adven\u00adde retssager.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
BGH, dom af 17. juli 2026, sag nr. V ZR 162\/25<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n