{"id":1645,"date":"2026-10-17T13:55:02","date_gmt":"2026-10-17T11:55:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kanzlei-reese.de\/?p=1645"},"modified":"2026-10-17T13:55:02","modified_gmt":"2026-10-17T11:55:02","slug":"knp-127-06c6d7c6ff34","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kanzlei-reese.de\/da\/knp-127-06c6d7c6ff34\/","title":{"rendered":"BGH: Hvem beta\u00adler m\u00e6g\u00adler\u00adpro\u00advi\u00adsio\u00adnen ved salg af et tofamilieshus?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Den, der k\u00f8ber et hus og i den for\u00adbin\u00addel\u00adse hyrer en ejen\u00addomsm\u00e6g\u00adler, der samt\u00adidig ogs\u00e5 arbej\u00adder for s\u00e6l\u00adge\u00adren, ken\u00adder m\u00e5s\u00adke prin\u00adcip\u00adpet om halv\u00addel af pro\u00advi\u00adsio\u00adnen<\/strong>: Siden 2020 har loven i \u00a7 656c i BGB fast\u00adsat, at k\u00f8ber og s\u00e6l\u00adger skal dele m\u00e6g\u00adler\u00adpro\u00advi\u00adsio\u00adnen lige\u00adligt, hvis m\u00e6g\u00adle\u00adren arbej\u00adder for beg\u00adge par\u00adter. Den\u00adne bestem\u00admel\u00adse g\u00e6l\u00adder dog kun ved k\u00f8b af en lej\u00adlig\u00adhed eller en Enkelt\u00adfa\u00admi\u00adlie\u00adhus<\/strong>. For\u00adbunds\u00addom\u00ads\u00adto\u00adlen har nu pr\u00e6cis\u00ade\u00adret, hvor\u00adn\u00e5r der pr\u00e6cist er tale om en s\u00e5dan enfa\u00admi\u00adlie\u00adbo\u00adlig, og hvor\u00adn\u00e5r der ikke er.<\/p>\n

Sagen: To-familiehus, men planlagt til eget brug<\/h2>\n

En ejen\u00addomsm\u00e6g\u00adler hav\u00adde for\u00admid\u00adlet en ejen\u00addom til en k\u00f8ber, som var annon\u00adce\u00adret som et udle\u00adjet tofa\u00admi\u00adlie\u00adhus. P\u00e5 tids\u00adpunk\u00adtet for indg\u00e5el\u00adsen af k\u00f8b\u00adsaf\u00adta\u00adlen var beg\u00adge boli\u00adgen\u00adhe\u00adder udle\u00adjet til sepa\u00adra\u00adte leje\u00adre. Ogs\u00e5 i den nota\u00adrielt bekr\u00e6f\u00adte\u00adde k\u00f8b\u00adsaf\u00adta\u00adle blev ejen\u00addom\u00admen udtrykke\u00adligt bete\u00adg\u00adnet som et tofamiliehus.<\/p>\n

K\u00f8be\u00adren med\u00addel\u00adte f\u00f8rst m\u00e6g\u00adle\u00adren efter indg\u00e5el\u00adsen af m\u00e6g\u00adleraf\u00adta\u00adlen<\/strong> med, at han egent\u00adlig \u00f8ns\u00adke\u00adde at benyt\u00adte ejen\u00addom\u00admen til egne bolig\u00adfor\u00adm\u00e5l. Han var af den opfat\u00adtel\u00adse, at pro\u00advi\u00adsi\u00adons\u00adaf\u00adta\u00adlen var ugyl\u00addig, for\u00addi prin\u00adcip\u00adpet om halv\u00adde\u00adling i \u00a7 656c i BGB ikke var ble\u00advet over\u00adholdt. M\u00e6g\u00adler\u00adpro\u00advi\u00adsio\u00adnen bur\u00adde der\u00adfor ikke have v\u00e6ret betalt fuldt ud af ham ale\u00adne. Land\u00adret\u00adten i Ber\u00adlin gav m\u00e6g\u00adle\u00adren med\u00adhold, og Kam\u00admer\u00adret\u00adten stad\u00adf\u00e6s\u00adtede dommen.<\/p>\n

Den tyske forbundsdomstols afg\u00f8relse<\/h2>\n

For\u00adbunds\u00addom\u00ads\u00adto\u00adlen afvis\u00adte k\u00f8be\u00adr\u00adens appel den 16. juli 2026 (sagsnr. I ZR 111\/25). M\u00e6g\u00adler\u00adens krav p\u00e5 pro\u00advi\u00adsi\u00adon er gyl\u00addigt. Ret\u00adten begrun\u00adde\u00adde det\u00adte med, at bestem\u00admel\u00adsen om hal\u00adve\u00adring af pro\u00advi\u00adsio\u00adnen kun fin\u00adder anven\u00addel\u00adse, hvis ejen\u00addom\u00admen objek\u00adtivt set kan klas\u00adsi\u00adfi\u00adce\u00adres som et enfamiliehus.<\/p>\n

Det afg\u00f8\u00adren\u00adde er her tids\u00adpunk\u00adtet for Indg\u00e5el\u00adse af afta\u00adlen<\/strong>. Det afg\u00f8\u00adren\u00adde er, om ejen\u00addom\u00admen ud fra sin fak\u00adtis\u00adke bes\u00adkaf\u00adfen\u00adhed tyde\u00adligt prim\u00e6rt tje\u00adner med\u00adlem\u00admer\u00adnes bolig\u00adfor\u00adm\u00e5l en enkelt husstand<\/strong> tje\u00adner. I den fore\u00adlig\u00adgen\u00adde sag var det\u00adte ikke til\u00adf\u00e6l\u00addet: Bygn\u00adin\u00adgen hav\u00adde to boli\u00adgen\u00adhe\u00adder af sam\u00adme v\u00e6r\u00addi, og ingen af dem hav\u00adde en under\u00adord\u00adnet betyd\u00adning i for\u00adhold til den anden.<\/p>\n

Hvis ejen\u00addom\u00admens karak\u00adter ikke enty\u00addigt tyder p\u00e5, at der er tale om et enfa\u00admi\u00adlie\u00adhus, er det if\u00f8l\u00adge For\u00adbunds\u00addom\u00ads\u00adto\u00adlen op til k\u00f8be\u00adren at med\u00adde\u00adle ejen\u00addomsm\u00e6g\u00adle\u00adren, hvor\u00addan han \u00f8ns\u00adker at anven\u00adde ejen\u00addom\u00admen senest ved kon\u00adtrak\u00adtens indg\u00e5el\u00adse<\/strong> med\u00adde\u00adle. Den, der f\u00f8rst g\u00f8r det\u00adte efter\u00adf\u00f8l\u00adgen\u00adde, kan ikke l\u00e6n\u00adge\u00adre p\u00e5ber\u00e5\u00adbe sig prin\u00adcip\u00adpet om halv\u00adde\u00adlings\u00adprin\u00adcip\u00adpet. Efter\u00adf\u00f8l\u00adgen\u00adde omst\u00e6n\u00addig\u00adhe\u00adder kan som udgangs\u00adpunkt ikke med til\u00adb\u00ada\u00adge\u00advir\u00adken\u00adde kraft oph\u00e6\u00adve gyl\u00addig\u00adhe\u00adden af en aller\u00ade\u00adde indg\u00e5et aftale.<\/p>\n

Hvad betyder det i praksis?<\/h2>\n

For ejen\u00addom\u00adsk\u00f8\u00adbe\u00adre er den\u00adne dom en vig\u00adtig ret\u00adtes\u00adnor. Den, der \u00f8ns\u00adker at k\u00f8be en ejen\u00addom, der for\u00admelt betrag\u00adtes som et tofa\u00admi\u00adlie\u00adhus eller annon\u00adce\u00adres som s\u00e5dan, men som egent\u00adlig er bereg\u00adnet til egen beb\u00adoel\u00adse, b\u00f8r tage h\u00f8j\u00adde for det\u00adte anven\u00addel\u00adses\u00adfor\u00adm\u00e5l aller\u00ade\u00adde f\u00f8r eller ved indg\u00e5el\u00adsen af m\u00e6g\u00adleraf\u00adta\u00adlen<\/strong> kom\u00admu\u00adni\u00adke\u00adre klart. F\u00f8rst da kan den lov\u00adm\u00e6s\u00adsi\u00adge bes\u00adkyt\u00adtel\u00adse i form af en hal\u00adve\u00adring af pro\u00advi\u00adsio\u00adnen tr\u00e6\u00adde i kraft.<\/p>\n