{"id":1600,"date":"2026-10-09T08:04:27","date_gmt":"2026-10-09T06:04:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kanzlei-reese.de\/?p=1600"},"modified":"2026-10-09T08:04:27","modified_gmt":"2026-10-09T06:04:27","slug":"knp-852-cc3590ab68e8","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kanzlei-reese.de\/da\/knp-852-cc3590ab68e8\/","title":{"rendered":"H\u00e6k\u00adke, gre\u00adne og tr\u00e6er ved grund\u00adgr\u00e6n\u00adsen: Hvad nab\u00ado\u00adreg\u00adler\u00adne egent\u00adlig tillader"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Der er n\u00e6s\u00adten intet emne, der s\u00e5 sik\u00adkert ska\u00adber uenig\u00adhed i nabos\u00adka\u00adber som tr\u00e6er, h\u00e6k\u00adke og udh\u00e6n\u00adgen\u00adde gre\u00adne. Den, der blot gri\u00adber til h\u00e6k\u00adke\u00adklip\u00adpe\u00adren uden at ken\u00adde de juri\u00addis\u00adke reg\u00adler, risi\u00adke\u00adrer at f\u00e5 pro\u00adblemer. Her f\u00f8l\u00adger et over\u00adblik over de vig\u00adtigs\u00adte reg\u00adler og aktu\u00adel\u00adle domstolsafg\u00f8relser.<\/p>\n<h2>S\u00e6sonbestemte begr\u00e6nsninger i henhold til naturbeskyttelsesloven<\/h2>\n<p>F\u00f8rst en vig\u00adtig grund\u00adre\u00adgel: Fra den 1. marts til den 30. sep\u00adtem\u00adber er det som udgangs\u00adpunkt for\u00adbudt at bes\u00adk\u00e6\u00adre kraft\u00adigt eller fjer\u00adne h\u00e6k\u00adke, leven\u00adde hegn, bus\u00adke og and\u00adre tr\u00e6er og bus\u00adke. Den tyske natur\u00adbes\u00adkyt\u00adtel\u00adses\u00adlov bes\u00adkyt\u00adter i den\u00adne peri\u00adode yng\u00adlen\u00adde fug\u00adle og and\u00adre dyr. Den, der over\u00adtr\u00e6\u00adder den\u00adne regel, kan bli\u00adve p\u00e5lagt en bety\u00adde\u00adlig b\u00f8de. Fra okto\u00adber er det igen til\u00adladt at fore\u00adta\u00adge mere omfat\u00adten\u00adde indgreb, forud\u00adsat at de \u00f8vri\u00adge lov\u00adm\u00e6s\u00adsi\u00adge beting\u00adel\u00adser er opfyldt.<\/p>\n<h2>H\u00f8j h\u00e6k \u2013 ingen ret til besk\u00e6ring?<\/h2>\n<p>Over\u00adras\u00adken\u00adde, men juri\u00addisk set klart: I man\u00adge dels\u00adtater m\u00e5 en h\u00e6k vok\u00adse s\u00e5 h\u00f8jt, som den vil, s\u00e5 l\u00e6n\u00adge den fores\u00adkrev\u00adne afstand til nabo\u00adgr\u00e6n\u00adsen over\u00adhol\u00addes. Appel\u00adret\u00adten i Frank\u00adfurt am Main afsag\u00adde i juli 2026 en dom i en tvist om en syv meter h\u00f8j bam\u00adbus\u00adh\u00e6k, hvor den fast\u00adslog, at nabo\u00aden i Hes\u00adsen ikke har ret til at kr\u00e6\u00adve, at h\u00e6k\u00adken bes\u00adk\u00e6\u00adres. Ret\u00adten pr\u00e6cis\u00ade\u00adre\u00adde desu\u00adden, at bam\u00adbus i juri\u00addisk forstand betrag\u00adtes som en h\u00e6k (Ober\u00adlan\u00addes\u00adge\u00adricht Frank\u00adfurt am Main, dom af 1. juli 2026, sag nr. 17 U 132\/22).<\/p>\n<h2>Hvor m\u00e5les h\u00f8jden?<\/h2>\n<p>Hvis en plan\u00adte st\u00e5r p\u00e5 en grund, der lig\u00adger h\u00f8je\u00adre end nabo\u00adgrun\u00adden, ops\u00adt\u00e5r sp\u00f8rgs\u00adm\u00e5\u00adlet om, fra hvil\u00adket niveau den til\u00adladte h\u00f8j\u00adde skal m\u00e5les. For\u00adbunds\u00addom\u00ads\u00adto\u00adlen har truf\u00adfet f\u00f8l\u00adgen\u00adde afg\u00f8\u00adrel\u00adse herom: Det afg\u00f8\u00adren\u00adde er som udgangs\u00adpunkt det punkt, hvor plan\u00adten kom\u00admer op af jor\u00adden. Niveau\u00adet p\u00e5 den lave\u00adre belig\u00adgen\u00adde nabo\u00adgrund spil\u00adler kun en rol\u00adle i und\u00adta\u00adgel\u00adse\u00adstil\u00adf\u00e6l\u00adde (BGH, dom af 27. juni 2025, sag nr. V ZR 180\/24).<\/p>\n<h2>Man m\u00e5 finde sig i skyggen fra tr\u00e6erne<\/h2>\n<p>Den tyske civil\u00adl\u00adov\u00adbog inde\u00adhol\u00adder ingen gene\u00adrel\u00adle reg\u00adler om afstan\u00adde til skel for tr\u00e6er og bus\u00adke; s\u00e5dan\u00adne bestem\u00admel\u00adser fin\u00addes i de enkel\u00adte dels\u00adtat\u00aders lov\u00adgiv\u00adning om naboskabs\u00adret. Bre\u00admen, Ham\u00adborg og Meck\u00adlen\u00adburg-Vor\u00adpom\u00admern har ingen egne reg\u00adler p\u00e5 det\u00adte omr\u00e5\u00adde. Grund\u00adl\u00e6g\u00adgen\u00adde g\u00e6l\u00adder det, at den, der m\u00e5 t\u00e5le skyg\u00adge fra nabo\u00adens tr\u00e6er, ikke har noget lov\u00adm\u00e6s\u00adsigt krav p\u00e5 bes\u00adk\u00e6ring eller f\u00e6ld\u00adning, s\u00e5fremt de i del\u00adstats\u00adlov\u00adgiv\u00adnin\u00adgen fast\u00adsat\u00adte afstan\u00adde til nabo\u00adgr\u00e6n\u00adsen over\u00adhol\u00addes. For\u00adbunds\u00addom\u00ads\u00adto\u00adlen (BGH) har fle\u00adre gan\u00adge bekr\u00e6f\u00adtet den\u00adne lin\u00adje (BGH, dom af 20. sep\u00adtem\u00adber 2019, sag nr. V ZR 218\/18; BGH, dom af 10. juli 2015, sag nr. V ZR 229\/14).<\/p>\n<h2>Udstikkende grene: Selvhj\u00e6lp kun efter fasts\u00e6ttelse af en&nbsp;frist<\/h2>\n<p>Hvis der h\u00e6n\u00adger gre\u00adne ind p\u00e5 ens egen grund, m\u00e5 man ikke bare sk\u00e6\u00adre dem af. F\u00f8rst skal nabo\u00aden opford\u00adres til selv at bes\u00adk\u00e6\u00adre tr\u00e6et, og der skal fast\u00ads\u00e6t\u00adtes en rime\u00adlig frist her\u00adtil. Hvis nabo\u00aden ikke reage\u00adrer, til\u00adla\u00adder \u00a7 910 i den tyske civil\u00adl\u00adov\u00adbog, at man selv bes\u00adk\u00e6\u00adrer gre\u00adne\u00adne, og det g\u00e6l\u00adder ogs\u00e5, sel\u00advom tr\u00e6et der\u00adved risi\u00adke\u00adrer at d\u00f8 (BGH, dom af 11. juni 2021, sag nr. V ZR 234\/19). Omvendt kan en ufag\u00adm\u00e6s\u00adsig bes\u00adk\u00e6ring bli\u00adve dyr: En lands\u00adret til\u00adkend\u00adte en ejer 750 euro i erstat\u00adning, for\u00addi hans pryd\u00adkir\u00adse\u00adb\u00e6r var ble\u00advet bes\u00adka\u00addi\u00adget (LG Coburg, dom af 9. juni 2006, sag nr. 33 S 26\/06).<\/p>\n<h2>For\u00e6ldelse og pligt til at sikre trafiksikkerheden<\/h2>\n<p>Hvis man ven\u00adter for l\u00e6n\u00adge, risi\u00adke\u00adrer man at mis\u00adte sin ret: For\u00adbunds\u00addom\u00ads\u00adto\u00adlen (BGH) har fast\u00adsl\u00e5et, at ret\u00adten til at f\u00e5 bes\u00adk\u00e5\u00adret udh\u00e6n\u00adgen\u00adde gre\u00adne er under\u00adlagt den almin\u00adde\u00adli\u00adge for\u00e6l\u00addel\u00adses\u00adfrist p\u00e5 tre \u00e5r (BGH, dom af 22. febru\u00adar 2019, sag nr. V ZR 136\/18). Uaf\u00adh\u00e6n\u00adgigt af nabostri\u00addig\u00adhe\u00adder skal grun\u00adde\u00adje\u00adre regel\u00adm\u00e6s\u00adsigt kon\u00adtrol\u00adlere deres tr\u00e6ers sta\u00adbi\u00adli\u00adtet og sund\u00adhedstil\u00adstand. Den, der over\u00adtr\u00e6\u00adder den\u00adne pligt til at sik\u00adre tra\u00adfik\u00adsik\u00adker\u00adhe\u00adden, og hvis et tr\u00e6 der\u00adved for\u00e5r\u00adsa\u00adger en ska\u00adde, h\u00e6f\u00adter for den\u00adne. Ved storm\u00adska\u00adder er der dog kun tale om erstat\u00adnings\u00adans\u00advar, hvis det kan bevi\u00adses, at ple\u00adjen er ble\u00advet fors\u00f8mt.<\/p>\n<p>Da nab\u00ado\u00adreg\u00adler\u00adne i h\u00f8j grad afh\u00e6n\u00adger af de respek\u00adti\u00adve del\u00adstatslove, anbe\u00adfa\u00adles det ved kon\u00adkre\u00adte tvis\u00adter at s\u00f8ge juri\u00addisk r\u00e5d\u00adgiv\u00adning for at afkla\u00adre de reg\u00adler, der g\u00e6l\u00adder i det enkel\u00adte tilf\u00e6lde.<\/p>\n<div id=\"knp-source-attribution\">\n<p>Kil\u00adde: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.haufe.de\/immobilien\/verwaltung\/nachbarrecht-hecken-und-baeume-an-der-grundstuecksgrenze_258_656776.html\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Hau\u00adfe: Ejendomme<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"knp-ai-disclosure\">\n<p>Det\u00adte indl\u00e6g og bil\u00adle\u00addet til artik\u00adlen er udar\u00adbej\u00addet med hj\u00e6lp fra kunst\u00adig intel\u00adli\u00adgens og redak\u00adtio\u00adnelt gennemg\u00e5et.<\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>H\u00e6k\u00adke, udh\u00e6n\u00adgen\u00adde gre\u00adne, skyg\u00adge fra tr\u00e6er: Hvad nab\u00ado\u00adreg\u00adler\u00adne til\u00adla\u00adder, og hvad de senes\u00adte dom\u00adme siger om&nbsp;emnet.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1410,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"wp_typography_post_enhancements_disabled":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[110,376,373,372,374,375],"class_list":["post-1600","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-mietrecht","tag-bgh-urteil","tag-grenzabstand","tag-heckenrueckschnitt","tag-nachbarrecht","tag-ueberhaengende-aeste","tag-verkehrssicherungspflicht"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kanzlei-reese.de\/da\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1600","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kanzlei-reese.de\/da\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kanzlei-reese.de\/da\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kanzlei-reese.de\/da\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kanzlei-reese.de\/da\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1600"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kanzlei-reese.de\/da\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1600\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kanzlei-reese.de\/da\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1410"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kanzlei-reese.de\/da\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1600"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kanzlei-reese.de\/da\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1600"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kanzlei-reese.de\/da\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1600"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}